Sunday, November 17, 2013
Literacy Blog #10
If you aggregate all the studies about global warming, the overall effect is positive today — and likely to stay positive until around 2080. That was the conclusion of Professor Richard Tol of Sussex University after he reviewed 14 different studies of the effects of future climate trends. I personally think this is crazy because if we know the affects will stop being positive in just 67 years then why are many people ignoring the problems now. If we start changing now we can keep those positive affect way into the future instead of just 67 years. Yeah I agree that a warmer climate might help now but when the Earth is so hot it “bursts in a ball of flames”(Eminem) we’ll then have problems. Even though I make jokes now in the future if we continue to do our bad habits the global temperatures will rise which in return will melt the glaciers covering the world in water. Now this may be a good idea if you have always wanted to live on the beach because it will eventually come to you or if you ever wanted to live on a houseboat you just better hope your house floats. The author talks about how more people die in winter than in summer, lower energy costs, probably fewer droughts, maybe richer biodiversity. I don’t know if it’s just me but probably and maybe doesn’t seem to legit. It says that if wealth increases it will be easier for people to cope with a different lifestyle in 2080 when the world has to become environmentally conscious. A 1.4% increase in the economy is no price to pay for killing the Earth that we all live on. Global warming is a bad thing yes they might be some good now but it will eventually become nothing but bad. If people way to take action when stuff is at it’s worse it will take even longer to correct such issues.
Labels:
bad,
crazy,
economy,
global warming,
good,
great,
informational
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Weekly Blog #9
I think it’s ridiculous to compare Oreo's to drugs. They’re nothing more than a sugary treat. People say they’re addicting because they lack the wheel power to put them down. I know this because I use to eat nothing but junk food and sweets. Now you would be lucky to ever see me eat anything sweet. I prefer being fit over stuffing my face with sweets. They might have did test on rats but that’s far from humans. The last time I checked we don’t have four legs and a tail. It makes sense that they would go for the center of the Oreo because it’s much easier for the rat to consume than the hard cookie. The reason I so highly doubt they’re just as addictive as cocaine is because they’re saying it’s easier to stop cocaine then Oreo’s. If that’s true how did I one day just say I’m going to live healthy and stop eating sweets altogether. That’s the problem with so many Americans now they think they’re addicted to junk food but really they just have a problem. Overall what I’m saying is it’s no ones choice but yours whether or not you want to live a healthy life and put down the junk food or live an unhealthy life and continue to kill yourself with junk food. You’re not addicted people that eat junk food are just as capable to give it up as someone that lives a healthy life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)